|
|
#289118 - 09/06/07 08:44 PM
2 questions
|
socalbloke
Registered: 04/17/07
Posts: 49
|
Offline
|
|
2 questions for guy who were circumcised as adults:
Which is better--local anesthetic or being put completely under?
The frenulum--better to keep or remove?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#289120 - 09/06/07 08:47 PM
Re: 2 questions
[Re: socalbloke]
|
sdp
Administrator
Registered: 12/29/00
Posts: 12513
Loc: San Diego, California
|
|
Offline
|
|
I don't think you should go completely under for a circumcision as going under is always a risk. Is that an option th edoctor gave you?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#289157 - 09/07/07 02:51 PM
Re: 2 questions
[Re: sdp]
|
willy7187
member
Registered: 06/14/05
Posts: 199
Loc: south jersey
|
|
Offline
|
|
I don't think theres any reason for general anesthesia for circumcision.
As far as the frenulum, I think its different for every guy. some say absolutely cut it since its job is to pull the foreskin foreward. others get a lot of pleasure from that area. a short frenulum was part of my problem, as well as phimosis, and so I got mine removed which turned out fine with me. thank God, but it was the worst part of the operation. not painful but rather uncomfortable even with all the shots.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
|
#289159 - 09/07/07 04:48 PM
Re: 2 questions
[Re: sdp]
|
socalbloke
Registered: 04/17/07
Posts: 49
|
|
Offline
|
|
Yes, I have the option of general, insurance will pay for it, but if I want it it will take several weeks to get an appointment. If I have a local they can do the circumcision at their on site faciility.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
Moderator: Amanda, Amz, cenfath, ClassyBlackWoman, Ineligible, LoveBritish, NtroducingMyself, Roc, sdp, ~AngelWitch~
|
