1 registered
(1 invisible)
and 25 anonymous users online.
|
|
|
#350045 - 10/27/09 08:20 PM
Faux News
|
unsupervised
Uber Sexy Canadian Member
Registered: 11/28/04
Posts: 8849
Loc: Reality
|
Offline
|
|
I just read this and laughed, so now I'm sharing because I'm a good boy In 2008, some 50 per cent of the Faux News viewers were over 63, the oldest demographic in the cable-news racket, and the majority of viewers of Hannity's and O'Reilly's shows were men. Yep, that's the Fox News demo – the cranky old guy who stormed out the front door and shouted at you to quit playing outside his house. He's still angry. Except right now he's angry about Obama.
_________________________
talk - action = zero
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350050 - 10/27/09 08:39 PM
Re: Faux News
[Re: unsupervised]
|
deek
Registered: 12/15/07
Posts: 492
|
Offline
|
|
Haha that's funny!!
_________________________
You shouldn't be judges by your sexuality but by your personality
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350052 - 10/27/09 09:23 PM
Re: Faux News
[Re: unsupervised]
|
thor
longstanding member
Registered: 06/27/06
Posts: 2253
Loc: here...not there
|
Offline
|
|
LOL...the "old guys". Yep...the ones who were around before the liberals began the brainwashing of the populace through the education system in this country. Now the liberals like Obama have threatened to shut down the station...or at least certain personnel there. Interesting...liberals 35-45 years ago were all for freedom of the press...now they wish the networks not on their payroll (owned by other flaming liberals) would go away. What happened the idea of the "freedom of the press" they used to talk about? It became no longer convenient for them. They want only their own songs sung on TV...a complete monopoly on what the public sees. Seems I've heard that line somewhere before.
Make no mistake...there are no more democrats or republicans...there are only liberals and the rest of us. And todays liberal is nothing more than a thinly-veiled socialist. So was Hitler and Stalin...who together were responsible for the deaths of over 100,000 of their own people. The writing is on the wall for those who are not blind and their heads not (yet) in the sand.
Thank you for bringing this up Mr u...keep 'em coming.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350053 - 10/27/09 09:52 PM
Re: Faux News
[Re: thor]
|
Rad
longstanding member
Registered: 04/19/06
Posts: 5133
Loc: USA
|
Offline
|
|
LOL...the "old guys". Yep...the ones who were around before the liberals began the brainwashing of the populace through the education system in this country. Now the liberals like Obama have threatened to shut down the station...or at least certain personnel there. Interesting...liberals 35-45 years ago were all for freedom of the press...now they wish the networks not on their payroll (owned by other flaming liberals) would go away. What happened the idea of the "freedom of the press" they used to talk about? It became no longer convenient for them. They want only their own songs sung on TV...a complete monopoly on what the public sees. Seems I've heard that line somewhere before.
Make no mistake...there are no more democrats or republicans...there are only liberals and the rest of us. And todays liberal is nothing more than a thinly-veiled socialist. So was Hitler and Stalin...who together were responsible for the deaths of over 100,000 of their own people. The writing is on the wall for those who are not blind and their heads not (yet) in the sand.
Thank you for bringing this up Mr u...keep 'em coming. I can tell you what happened to Freedom of the Press: The right abused it. Told too many lies. Became domestic terrorists, rather than honorable opponents. While it makes me very sad to even think about the prospect, if this domestic terrorism does not stop, I see no other alternative. You are not allowed to say just anything you want under free speech and, unfortunately, it's not limited to truth. But, you are not allowed to yell fire in a crowded theater and it should not be slanderous or libelous. But, the right doesn't care. Fox makes lies a network policy. Anything, ANYTHING it takes to bring down the opposing party. How long do you expect domestic terrorism to be allowed under the guise of Freedom of Speech? I know, I know!!! You'll say it's me lying and you telling the truth, but I do believe statistics do back me up. Whether it's severe enough to take action? I don't know, but I fear it's getting to that point! So, it's the right that is brainwashed and being subversive to the US government. So, that's what has happened to freedom of the press. Thank you, thor, for bringing it up for discussion for the 50th time.
_________________________
--Rad
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350060 - 10/28/09 01:15 AM
Re: Faux News
[Re: Rad]
|
thor
longstanding member
Registered: 06/27/06
Posts: 2253
Loc: here...not there
|
Offline
|
|
LOL...the "old guys". Yep...the ones who were around before the liberals began the brainwashing of the populace through the education system in this country. Now the liberals like Obama have threatened to shut down the station...or at least certain personnel there. Interesting...liberals 35-45 years ago were all for freedom of the press...now they wish the networks not on their payroll (owned by other flaming liberals) would go away. What happened the idea of the "freedom of the press" they used to talk about? It became no longer convenient for them. They want only their own songs sung on TV...a complete monopoly on what the public sees. Seems I've heard that line somewhere before.
Make no mistake...there are no more democrats or republicans...there are only liberals and the rest of us. And todays liberal is nothing more than a thinly-veiled socialist. So was Hitler and Stalin...who together were responsible for the deaths of over 100,000 of their own people. The writing is on the wall for those who are not blind and their heads not (yet) in the sand.
Thank you for bringing this up Mr u...keep 'em coming. I can tell you what happened to Freedom of the Press: The right abused it. Told too many lies. Became domestic terrorists, rather than honorable opponents. While it makes me very sad to even think about the prospect, if this domestic terrorism does not stop, I see no other alternative. You are not allowed to say just anything you want under free speech and, unfortunately, it's not limited to truth. But, you are not allowed to yell fire in a crowded theater and it should not be slanderous or libelous. But, the right doesn't care. Fox makes lies a network policy. Anything, ANYTHING it takes to bring down the opposing party. How long do you expect domestic terrorism to be allowed under the guise of Freedom of Speech? I know, I know!!! You'll say it's me lying and you telling the truth, but I do believe statistics do back me up. Whether it's severe enough to take action? I don't know, but I fear it's getting to that point! So, it's the right that is brainwashed and being subversive to the US government. So, that's what has happened to freedom of the press. Thank you, thor, for bringing it up for discussion for the 50th time.
So...now a liberal says it's OK to take rights away when the situation warrants it. And who determins what kind of situation that might be...the people? Apparently not. Sounds like a military state...certainly different from the liberal attitude of the '60s. One step closer to dictatorial socialism, to be sure.
As a reminder, one more question...whom is it that has said they would like to prevent freedom of speach for certain folks...a right guaranteed ALL by our Constitution?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350064 - 10/28/09 10:02 AM
Re: Faux News
[Re: thor]
|
unsupervised
Uber Sexy Canadian Member
Registered: 11/28/04
Posts: 8849
Loc: Reality
|
Offline
|
|
Now the liberals like Obama have threatened to shut down the station...or at least certain personnel there
source please
_________________________
talk - action = zero
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350067 - 10/28/09 10:50 AM
Re: Faux News
[Re: thor]
|
Rad
longstanding member
Registered: 04/19/06
Posts: 5133
Loc: USA
|
Offline
|
|
There have been 2 Sedition Acts passed by Congress that I know of. 1798 & 1918.
I do NOT advocate such an act, nor do I think it is "OK". But, neither do I think your activities are "OK"!
All I'm saying is this: Any normal person can plainly see that domestic terrorism can not be tolerated forever and IF people like you can not practice Freedom of Speech in the way it should be practiced, in truthful discourse, then the loss of those rights will fall right in your lap.
The Constitutionality of such acts have never been adjudicated. Maybe they never will be heard in the Supreme Court. Who knows?
_________________________
--Rad
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350075 - 10/28/09 01:19 PM
Re: Faux News
[Re: thor]
|
unsupervised
Uber Sexy Canadian Member
Registered: 11/28/04
Posts: 8849
Loc: Reality
|
Offline
|
|
LOL...the "old guys". Yep...the ones who were around before the liberals began the brainwashing of the populace through the education system in this country.
well, I'm a little older than you but that's neither here nor there. 
Here's what I see has happened to both the media and American conservatism over the past several years. I admit, I still haven't reached my final conclusion on the chicken vs the egg yet.
There was a time when conservative had this quaint, old fashioned sense about it. A granny, shaking her head at "these kids today with their rocking and their rolling" and the quiet hope that none of those darkies will move in next door. Or the WASP heading off to work in his IBM suit, coming home to a ready roast beef dinner, a jug of martinis, knock the wife around a bit then off to bed. There was always a darker, more extreme side but they tended to hide behind white hoods and occasionally badges.
Then there was a change in the US media. Prior to 1984, the FCC regulated "public affairs" content for broadcasters. Often referred to as the 5-5-10 rule, broadcasters had to air a minimum of 5% local, 5% information and 10% non-entertainment content during the day. With a mandated minimum NEWS content on every station, the public had the opportunity to stay informed about world events, should they choose to tune in. The FCC dropped that regulation in 84 and the content of NEWS began to drop off in favor of content that would better sell advertising. Many may actually remember FOX as being one of the first networks to have no NEWS programming whatsoever. But people like the NEWS and were still looking for it. What they started to receive, however, was less NEWS and more opinion and punditry dressed in a NEWS format. All you have to do is watch CNN for an afternoon to see how little actual NEWS is aired (and how many commercials)
Now, John Q Public, who used to have various information services upon which to base his opinions, has less information and more of other people's opinions on which to for an opinion. Now his view of the world is filtered though someone else's view of the world. He must accept the "facts" as they are presented by pundits and politicians. This is why, sadly, so many Americas were left after 9/11 wondering "who are these people and why do they hate us?".
Enter Limbaugh, Hannity, O'Riely, etc. All presenting their radically conservative ideologies in a "NEWS" format, out in the open, hoods off. It is now their eyes through which many conservatives see the world. They've gone so far as to try to paint the purveyors of just "plain old NEWS" as being the "liberal media"
So the modern neo-conservative is either a product of this media shift or, more likely, a victim.
_________________________
talk - action = zero
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350077 - 10/28/09 03:40 PM
Re: Faux News
[Re: unsupervised]
|
thor
longstanding member
Registered: 06/27/06
Posts: 2253
Loc: here...not there
|
Offline
|
|
Now the liberals like Obama have threatened to shut down the station...or at least certain personnel there source please
It's been literally all over the net for several weeks now. But because you said "please", here's an example:
Obama aide: Fox News is biased
...and another (just for fun):
Obama vs Fox News
While you may not agree that Fox News is fair and balanced (and if you've been brainwashed/liberal you most certainly will not), one can't deny the inappropriateness of the Obama administration in handling thier own desires to allow the public to see only what Obama & Co. wants us to. As was pointed out in the second link, excluding access to the Whitehouse is a Constitutional violation...not that Obama cares about any such thing.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350078 - 10/28/09 03:53 PM
Re: Faux News
[Re: unsupervised]
|
thor
longstanding member
Registered: 06/27/06
Posts: 2253
Loc: here...not there
|
Offline
|
|
This excerpt from another link rings all too true:
Can you imagine the outrage that would have ensued had former President George W. Bush declared off-limits those media outlets he thought (correctly) treated him unfairly?
Heck, the left declared him a dictator simply because he led a war on Iraq that Congress approved. He never tried to shut down his critics. He rarely even objected to their abuse.
But liberal politicians have been spoiled with mainstream media favoritism for so long that they believe anything other than sycophancy is mistreatment. Their selective outrage is as hollow as it is risible.
In fact, Fox News seems much more conservative than it is because no other television network over the past half-century has been anything but decidedly liberal. When the media norm is liberal, liberals equate liberalism with objectivity and deviations from it as bias, just as liberals preach tolerance toward all ideas — except conservative ones. Their self-delusion is surreal.
Obama's War on Fox...
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350079 - 10/28/09 04:07 PM
Re: Faux News
[Re: thor]
|
unsupervised
Uber Sexy Canadian Member
Registered: 11/28/04
Posts: 8849
Loc: Reality
|
Offline
|
|
and in which of those two articles do we see the threats to "shut down" anyone?
It also seems that the reference to a "fairness doctrine" in the second article is made without any knowledge of broadcast history or changes in the FCC. In 1987, the FCC repealed the fairness doctrine, which required broadcasters "to air controversial issues of public concern and provide a fair representation of opposing views". Not exactly as stated in your article on BayouBuzz where it's described as "to silence talk radio and shut down another source of opposition to the Obama agenda"
bias? what bias?
Can you imagine the outrage that would have ensued had former President George W. Bush declared off-limits those media outlets he thought (correctly) treated him unfairly?
he did! he refused to appear on BET, remember?
_________________________
talk - action = zero
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350082 - 10/28/09 06:42 PM
Re: Faux News
[Re: unsupervised]
|
LuvMyCats
member
Registered: 05/21/06
Posts: 671
Loc: The meadow of sinful thoughts
|
Offline
|
|
Thor, I agree and back you on this one. The gov't has been getting too on the news lately, and not in the good way.
U: Really, the silencing, or rather, proposed silencing of Fox has been quite literally everywhere, but it's been dying down lately.
to silence talk radio and shut down another source of opposition to the Obama agenda"
bias? what bias?
This bias is alive and well, and I feel it should be said, if you can't see it, although you have different media outlets than we do, then you're turning away from it.
_________________________
It is always better to have no ideas than false ones; to believe nothing, than to believe what is wrong. Thomas Jefferson
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350083 - 10/28/09 06:53 PM
Re: Faux News
[Re: LuvMyCats]
|
unsupervised
Uber Sexy Canadian Member
Registered: 11/28/04
Posts: 8849
Loc: Reality
|
Offline
|
|
well, you just re-quoted my quote from the article without the original verbiage of the FCC regulations as juxtaposition, which means you just removed all context from my statement. Did you even understand it?
second, all I've heard is the administration's objection to the Fox bias and nothing about silencing it... unless that information is being presented through the right wing, pseudo news organisations as I described in my post on the changes in media. You should read it.
_________________________
talk - action = zero
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350207 - 11/01/09 01:38 AM
Re: Faux News
[Re: unsupervised]
|
unsupervised
Uber Sexy Canadian Member
Registered: 11/28/04
Posts: 8849
Loc: Reality
|
Offline
|
|
as Faux News has been a bee in my bonnet lately, I've been looking a little deeper.
ya know, they don't even describe themselves as being a serious news source. They state that only 6 hours a day is dedicated to actual news. The rest is opinion. Quick math - 3/4 not news.
Glenn Beck doesn't claim to be a journalist. He doesn't even claim to be a pundit. He's a comedian and in his own words, he is a "rodeo clown"
Oh, and all the big names that we associate with Faux News, Hannity, O'Riely, Beck, etc., are not part of the 6 hours of news. They are the 18 hours of opinion, though they are often quoted as "sources say" during the little news bits. That's cute
_________________________
talk - action = zero
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350217 - 11/01/09 11:24 AM
Re: Faux News
[Re: unsupervised]
|
thor
longstanding member
Registered: 06/27/06
Posts: 2253
Loc: here...not there
|
Offline
|
|
as Faux News has been a bee in my bonnet lately, I've been looking a little deeper. ya know, they don't even describe themselves as being a serious news source. They state that only 6 hours a day is dedicated to actual news. The rest is opinion. Quick math - 3/4 not news. Glenn Beck doesn't claim to be a journalist. He doesn't even claim to be a pundit. He's a comedian and in his own words, he is a "rodeo clown" Oh, and all the big names that we associate with Faux News, Hannity, O'Riely, Beck, etc., are not part of the 6 hours of news. They are the 18 hours of opinion, though they are often quoted as "sources say" during the little news bits. That's cute
OK...now, if you wish to be considered serious and not just another liberal blow-hard, you have to do the same research for the other news networks; CBS, NBC, ABC etc. Other than Fox, they're all pretty much alike...so pick any two.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350220 - 11/01/09 02:47 PM
Re: Faux News
[Re: thor]
|
unsupervised
Uber Sexy Canadian Member
Registered: 11/28/04
Posts: 8849
Loc: Reality
|
Offline
|
|
if you'd taken a moment to read my post on the changes in the FCC and it's effect on news in general, you'd see that I have done the research. Editorial bias has been an issue since the first news paper was printed. Don't assume that my criticism of fox is a defense of the others. But if you turn to fox as a source of information, you should be outraged at their insult to your intelligence
_________________________
talk - action = zero
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350223 - 11/01/09 03:17 PM
Re: Faux News
[Re: unsupervised]
|
unsupervised
Uber Sexy Canadian Member
Registered: 11/28/04
Posts: 8849
Loc: Reality
|
Offline
|
|
Conservative engaged to member of the "liberal" media Defence Minister Peter MacKay to marry CTV news executive
awww, there's hope for all of us! Oh, and some of the comments added at the bottom of the article are priceless!
_________________________
talk - action = zero
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350241 - 11/02/09 10:05 AM
Re: Faux News
[Re: unsupervised]
|
thor
longstanding member
Registered: 06/27/06
Posts: 2253
Loc: here...not there
|
Offline
|
|
if you'd taken a moment to read my post on the changes in the FCC and it's effect on news in general, you'd see that I have done the research. Editorial bias has been an issue since the first news paper was printed. Don't assume that my criticism of fox is a defense of the others. But if you turn to fox as a source of information, you should be outraged at their insult to your intelligence
I feel the same way about the other networks. Seems more and more people are agreeing with me, too...after having their "intelligence insulted" by the other networks for far too long, they're turning to Fox. This article also states how Fox gives airtime to Dems (a verifiable fact), while the other networks...well, you can read the comment in the article for yourself.
The pro-Fox Democrats
I'm not saying Fox is perfect and doesn't engage in the game of "opinions". I AM saying that they do a better job than any of the other flamingly liberal networks at telling the whole truth. When all you've heard comes from the other networks, it seems centrist...making Fox look conservative. It is...but is really much closer to center than any of the other networks.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350249 - 11/02/09 01:34 PM
Re: Faux News
[Re: thor]
|
bobalicious
*property of AngelWitch*
Registered: 12/25/04
Posts: 8443
Loc: Ireland
|
Offline
|
|
It is...but is really much closer to center than any of the other networks.
Its much closer to your centre, but not really to any logical centre. FOX is far more biased than most stations but by no means am I saying that its alone. All of the major American "News" stations have succumbed to the very personal, one-on-one, having-a-chat kind of news presentation. They aim their broadcast at demographics instead of just giving the news. MSNBC is quite obviously a "left wing" channel, Keith Olbermann's show especially.
HERE is a news report from RTÉ News, Ireland's main news program. It takes about a minute, shows images and gives the facts and reactions by locals. Nothing more. No blaming the incident on officials' lack of actions or the President's stance on smoking.
BBC is starting to suffer from acting like American news programs, adding opinion polls and viewer input into issues that don't involve them one single bit. Sky News also fell into the same trap a few years ago.
_________________________
If God created everything, then He created shit. Therefore, God is an ass.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350255 - 11/02/09 02:42 PM
Re: Faux News
[Re: thor]
|
Grvtykllr
Magnificent Mountaineering Member
Registered: 10/18/05
Posts: 7146
Loc: Any Vertical plane I can find
|
Offline
|
|
That is the most laughable crock of shit I have read since I visited the site last week and read your moral conservative ramblings.
_________________________
Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350256 - 11/02/09 02:45 PM
Re: Faux News
[Re: bobalicious]
|
thor
longstanding member
Registered: 06/27/06
Posts: 2253
Loc: here...not there
|
Offline
|
|
It is...but is really much closer to center than any of the other networks. Its much closer to your centre, but not really to any logical centre.
It has to do with historical positions on issues and how they have changed over the years...not some logical calculation of any sort. This is where being around for awhile has an advantage; trends can be witnessed first-hand. Some of the socialistic stunts the liberals are pulling these days would have likely landed them in jail 40/50 years ago. But now we have some of the "news" outlets pushing it as centrist, with a near-centrist view being touted as radically conservative. Some folks honestly don't know any better, though.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350261 - 11/02/09 03:03 PM
Re: Faux News
[Re: thor]
|
OldFolks
Tall and sexy member
Registered: 10/04/05
Posts: 4374
Loc: Just Beyond the Reach of Light
|
Offline
|
|
>>>It has to do with historical positions on issues and how they have changed over the years...not some logical calculation of any sort. This is where being around for awhile has an advantage; trends can be witnessed first-hand. Some of the socialistic stunts the liberals are pulling these days would have likely landed them in jail 40/50 years ago.
Couldn't the same thing be said about letting them Negroes serve in an integrated military or go to integrated schools or vote or marry our women.
Shit changes with time. Just because something was one or the other in the past doesn't make it better or worse. The argument is about the merit of the change in this time, and whether it adequately serve the desires of the populace or overreaches and infringes on the rights of the populace against their will.
_________________________
There is no punishment. There is no reward. There are only consequences.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350263 - 11/02/09 03:08 PM
Re: Faux News
[Re: OldFolks]
|
thor
longstanding member
Registered: 06/27/06
Posts: 2253
Loc: here...not there
|
Offline
|
|
>>>It has to do with historical positions on issues and how they have changed over the years...not some logical calculation of any sort. This is where being around for awhile has an advantage; trends can be witnessed first-hand. Some of the socialistic stunts the liberals are pulling these days would have likely landed them in jail 40/50 years ago.
Couldn't the same thing be said about letting them Negroes serve in an integrated military or go to integrated schools or vote or marry our women.
Shit changes with time. Just because something was one or the other in the past doesn't make it better or worse. The argument is about the merit of the change in this time, and whether it adequately serve the desires of the populace or overreaches and infringes on the rights of the populace against their will.
I understand what you're saying, but it has nothing to do with our talking point. We're talking left vs. right, conservative vs. liberal, in terms of how news is reported. The hope (at least for me) is a fair and balanced media. Whether what the media is pushing or not as being better or worse for the country has nothing to do with our discussion...and, in my opinion, is NOT THEIR JOB!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350264 - 11/02/09 03:09 PM
Re: Faux News
[Re: thor]
|
Grvtykllr
Magnificent Mountaineering Member
Registered: 10/18/05
Posts: 7146
Loc: Any Vertical plane I can find
|
Offline
|
|
Horse shit. You mother fuckers moved the center so far to the right that it made the center the left.
_________________________
Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350268 - 11/02/09 03:14 PM
Re: Faux News
[Re: Grvtykllr]
|
thor
longstanding member
Registered: 06/27/06
Posts: 2253
Loc: here...not there
|
Offline
|
|
Horse shit. You mother fuckers moved the center so far to the right that it made the center the left.
I'm certain you wish this was true, but if you'd checked back with how things were when this country started out, you'll see you're wrong. But since you already said you don't care about this country, I guess I can't expect you to be bothered to go dig up the facts. Am I right?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350271 - 11/02/09 03:21 PM
Re: Faux News
[Re: thor]
|
bobalicious
*property of AngelWitch*
Registered: 12/25/04
Posts: 8443
Loc: Ireland
|
Offline
|
|
This is where being around for awhile has an advantage; trends can be witnessed first-hand.
You're going to have to stop using this age thing as an argument. You're not 50 years older than me, or 40 or 30 even. I doubt you're even 20 years older.
Some of the socialistic stunts the liberals are pulling these days would have likely landed them in jail 40/50 years ago.
Like refusing to give up your seat on a bus to a white man? To repeat my point, old does not automatically equal correct.
But now we have some of the "news" outlets pushing it as centrist, with a near-centrist view being touted as radically conservative. Some folks honestly don't know any better, though.
A centre position cannot be achieved in American news as it has been overcome by opinion. Spin is used by both sides (yes, even in the No-Spin Zone). Fox News is, without a doubt, in favour of the Republicans and the conservative right.
_________________________
If God created everything, then He created shit. Therefore, God is an ass.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350275 - 11/02/09 03:26 PM
Re: Faux News
[Re: thor]
|
Grvtykllr
Magnificent Mountaineering Member
Registered: 10/18/05
Posts: 7146
Loc: Any Vertical plane I can find
|
Offline
|
|
I said I do nto care about THIS country, this maggot infested piece of shit that stands today. Not what it used to be. WHat it is today is decay and corrupt and needs to be shot in the fucking head and put out of the worlds misery. If you want to cry about me not caring, than atleast get it right. To simply say I do not care about my country is a crock of shit and you know it.
As to research, Iv lived it dumb ass, I can recall when fucking ford was in the whitehouse, Iv seen the moves, I watched it all, I lived it. I simply do not have my head up my ass so far that I can not see the light of day, I was here, Iv seen my freedoms erode and others torn from me, Iv watched as uncle sam wiped his ass with the constitution and raped lady justice. Its good she had the blind fold on, harder to ID your attacker when you can not see them.
You can stuff your ideas and ideals in your ass and suck a bag of dicks. I on the other hand finished lunch, I got a bedroom to paint and some tile to seal so I can move to the new digs. Then however, I am going to sit down and smoke a fucking fat one and laugh at you and yours thor. So certain they are in the right and on gods side, all the while to fucking dumb to ever consider that they could be wrong. I fart in your general direction, your mother was a hamster, and your father smelt of elderberries. I blow my nose at you, you kinniggets!.
_________________________
Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350279 - 11/02/09 03:31 PM
Re: Faux News
[Re: bobalicious]
|
Grvtykllr
Magnificent Mountaineering Member
Registered: 10/18/05
Posts: 7146
Loc: Any Vertical plane I can find
|
Offline
|
|
Very nice bobbo!
"If God created everything, then He created shit. Therefore, God is an ass."
using logic? I think maybe youll be better off if you avoid traveling to the US. I do however love your signature, I had not noticed it till I clicked submit and when it refreshed it was the first words on my screen. Very nice, very very nice. I shall try this argument next time the wife asks who took a shit and did not flush the toilet.
"FUck Julz, it was god, he is an ass. He created all things and so he created shit, know what else makes shit? an ass, so god shit in the toilet and left it floating for you to find, just to ruin your fucking day!" If nothing else, it should leave her standing silent, flabbergasted, unable to point a counter attack, and giving me time to throw a leash on the dog and take her out for a walk. By my return she will have forgotten all about it. Brilliant!
_________________________
Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350283 - 11/02/09 03:39 PM
Re: Faux News
[Re: Grvtykllr]
|
bobalicious
*property of AngelWitch*
Registered: 12/25/04
Posts: 8443
Loc: Ireland
|
Offline
|
|
If nothing else, it should leave her standing silent, flabbergasted, unable to point a counter attack, and giving me time to throw a leash on the dog and take her out for a walk. By my return she will have forgotten all about it. Brilliant!
Don't call your wife a bitch! Although I like the idea of her having a leash...
_________________________
If God created everything, then He created shit. Therefore, God is an ass.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350284 - 11/02/09 03:41 PM
Re: Faux News
[Re: thor]
|
Grvtykllr
Magnificent Mountaineering Member
Registered: 10/18/05
Posts: 7146
Loc: Any Vertical plane I can find
|
Offline
|
|
I, am never wrong. Unless you ask my wife, then I am never right, unless I agree with her.
Just for fun Thor, id like you to watch a movie. ITs not political, it is however a dark, disturbing little film. After you see it, lets have a chat.
Depending on where you find it to rent its either called the perfect witness, or the ungodly. No it has nothing to do with god. it came out in 2007, under perfect witness, but IMDB shows that as well as it coming out in 2010 under the ungodly. I found this fucked up shit after watching it and looing up teh director and writer (thomas c. Dunn) because I had never heard of him before. I watched it at random on netflix. If you have netflix, it comes up under dark thrillers or some shit. I may be gone for a while, once my shit is done I am moving and will be with no net till the install is completed at the new house. but Id like to discuss this with you when I do make it back. Mr U, I suggest you see it as well, and of course bobbo should, Id also love to hear scottys take on it. God and philosophy and how it all is justification for murder and rape. I saw it halloween night, Iv watched it 2 more times since then, do not leave to piss or get a drink, or turn your head, youll miss something each time you look away from the screen, leaving the room is a sin.
I have yet to decide if I like this movie or not, but it does fucking command attention and stays in your head.
_________________________
Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350285 - 11/02/09 03:42 PM
Re: Faux News
[Re: bobalicious]
|
Grvtykllr
Magnificent Mountaineering Member
Registered: 10/18/05
Posts: 7146
Loc: Any Vertical plane I can find
|
Offline
|
|
If anyone was gonna wear a leash, it would be me. she freaks out with ropes or cuffs on while I relax and enjoy it.
_________________________
Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350291 - 11/02/09 04:34 PM
Re: Faux News
[Re: Grvtykllr]
|
thor
longstanding member
Registered: 06/27/06
Posts: 2253
Loc: here...not there
|
Offline
|
|
Just for fun Thor, id like you to watch a movie. ITs not political, it is however a dark, disturbing little film. After you see it, lets have a chat.
OK...as long as you try to leave the foul language out of our discussion (a slip here or there is acceptable). That's my condition. It may take a couple weeks, though...I'll have to watch it on a night when my wife goes to bed early. By the description I get on Netflix, it's not something she'd want to sit through.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350296 - 11/02/09 05:33 PM
Re: Faux News
[Re: Grvtykllr]
|
unsupervised
Uber Sexy Canadian Member
Registered: 11/28/04
Posts: 8849
Loc: Reality
|
Offline
|
|
hmm, I've never heard of this movie but I'll see if I can dig it up at the indie film place. OK...as long as you try to leave the foul language out of our discussion
is that because you don't like those dirty little words or are you trying to prudently save time by cutting his word count in half?
_________________________
talk - action = zero
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350306 - 11/02/09 06:43 PM
Re: Faux News
[Re: unsupervised]
|
Rad
longstanding member
Registered: 04/19/06
Posts: 5133
Loc: USA
|
Offline
|
|
hmm, I've never heard of this movie but I'll see if I can dig it up at the indie film place. OK...as long as you try to leave the foul language out of our discussion is that because you don't like those dirty little words or are you trying to prudently save time by cutting his word count in half? LOL
_________________________
--Rad
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350325 - 11/03/09 01:30 PM
Re: Faux News
[Re: unsupervised]
|
Grvtykllr
Magnificent Mountaineering Member
Registered: 10/18/05
Posts: 7146
Loc: Any Vertical plane I can find
|
Offline
|
|
It would cut my word count in half. I have to refuse however. This is how i talk, and how I type. Its not that I think I can beat thor to submission with a conversation about this film, its that the film brings up so much shit to think about, and on most shit, thor is 180 degrees off of my own thoughts. I really can not say alot about this film with out giving away key points, or I could explain better. Mr U, I think you would enjoy it, and bobbo as well, but the two of you have thoughts more closely related to mine, what fun is it to have that conversation? Scotty I think would like the film as well, and while he shares many traits with me on these kinds of things, he always brings some shit to the conversation I never thought to include.
Now if a certain girl were to want to talk dark tower with me.... she knows the basics, she should hurry the fuck up and read the rest, and the books that I pointed her to that play a major role in the tower, then let me know. TAK!
Edited by Grvtykllr (11/03/09 01:31 PM)
_________________________
Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350329 - 11/03/09 01:46 PM
Re: Faux News
[Re: Grvtykllr]
|
OldFolks
Tall and sexy member
Registered: 10/04/05
Posts: 4374
Loc: Just Beyond the Reach of Light
|
Offline
|
|
I shall endeavor to view it over this fortnight but make no promises that I will be successful in the task set before me.
Basically cause I just read your post yesterday and already can't remember what the fuck it's called. That and I'm tight as hell when it comes to renting a movie. I'm one of those, 'why rent when you can own' kind of guys. So is it worth me buying it?
And, why the fuck are you on the computer today? I thought you were netless.
_________________________
There is no punishment. There is no reward. There are only consequences.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350333 - 11/03/09 02:05 PM
Re: Faux News
[Re: OldFolks]
|
Grvtykllr
Magnificent Mountaineering Member
Registered: 10/18/05
Posts: 7146
Loc: Any Vertical plane I can find
|
Offline
|
|
well, I shall be netless. I am currently waiting for the gas company to show up and turn my gas on. Had it on once, smelled gas the next day, called them to bring in some expertise and sniff out the leak. Now i have one bedroom to paint, and the gas company to return and check for leaks since the repairs are now done then I can lay the linoleum in the bathroom and install a toilet and turn on the furnace and Im ready to move. I was supposed to be out last weekend, but that swine flu shit nearly killed me and I took a week off to heal, well not ot heal as much as I was unable to lift anything more than a can of coke or a new roll of ass wipe, so could not venture out to get the new place finished. Cost met he sale of my house, but its relisted and Iv had 3 people looking at it, it will be sold soon I think. Once I move though, I am netless. till it gets moved to the new house anyways. If I move this weekend and have all teh shit finished before then, I shall only be with no net for a week at most. Would I buy that movie? I watched it 3 times in 2 days.Its dark, I only found one major problem in its editing, and it forces you to think about shit you really would rather not. is it worth owning? I think so. the serial killer happens to be one of the writers, the director is the other writer, who happens to make a small appearance as the second guy at the AA meeting. I have no idea where the fuck these two came from and why I never heard of them before, but I will be watching for new shit to come from Dunn and releases of new movies that Mark Borkowski appears in.
On netflix everyone gave it a good review, on IMDB people hated it. It took me a few days to decide I liked the movie. It lacks the numerous killings that most serial killer movies have, not alot of blood in it. its the writing and dialog I loved, the shit it made me think about well after it was over.
Conscience is a sick bed. Under its filthy sheets lay all our fears. It's not conscience that prevents men from killing and raping, it's consequence. Fear of death, jails, God. But really where is he? Do they hear his name when they scream it? Do they return to him piece by piece when I'm finished with them? The moment that God strikes me down I'll smile, 'cause I'll believe in him for the first time.
_________________________
Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350338 - 11/03/09 02:52 PM
Re: Faux News
[Re: Grvtykllr]
|
OldFolks
Tall and sexy member
Registered: 10/04/05
Posts: 4374
Loc: Just Beyond the Reach of Light
|
Offline
|
|
Okay, it sounds like something that may interest me. I'll probably have time to watch next weekend. I'll be broke waiting for payday and so doing nothing then.
_________________________
There is no punishment. There is no reward. There are only consequences.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350341 - 11/03/09 03:12 PM
Re: Faux News
[Re: OldFolks]
|
unsupervised
Uber Sexy Canadian Member
Registered: 11/28/04
Posts: 8849
Loc: Reality
|
Offline
|
|
yeah, sounds like my nurse would like it too. Going to see if I can track it down on the weekend
_________________________
talk - action = zero
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#350718 - 11/12/09 09:25 AM
Jon Stewart Catches Fox Falsifying Footage
[Re: unsupervised]
|
OldFolks
Tall and sexy member
Registered: 10/04/05
Posts: 4374
Loc: Just Beyond the Reach of Light
|
Offline
|
|
Jon Stewart Catches Fox Using 9/12 Footage To Make Tea Party Look Bigger
On the Daily Show last night, Jon Stewart pointed out that, in a segment about Rep. Michele Bachmann's tea party rally at the Capitol last week, Fox News' Sean Hannity used footage from the much bigger 9/12 rally, apparently to pump up the attendance numbers.
The Daily Show - Nov. 10, 2009
_________________________
There is no punishment. There is no reward. There are only consequences.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
Moderator: Amanda, Amz, cenfath, ClassyBlackWoman, Ineligible, LoveBritish, NtroducingMyself, Roc, sdp, ~AngelWitch~
|